Overall, in a weak matrix, the functional manager reigns supreme. FUNCTIONAL, WEAK MATRIX, BALANCED MATRIX, STRONG MATRIX, PROJECTIZED. The identifying feature of a matrix organization is that some managers report to two bosses rather than to the traditional single boss; there is a dual rather than a single chain of command. A project coordinator has some say in the allocation of resources, while a project expeditor serves only as a point of communication between the customer and team. If the project manager/expeditor has less control over the project than the functional manager, the organization is weak matrix. Here are the top six reasons (from the academic research and our own consulting experience) why companies introduce a matrix: To meet the needs of global or regional customers who want a consistent international agreement and point of contact. 6 key advantages of the matrix organization. In a weak matrix organization structure, the project manager has a limited role but the functional managers have authority and power. There was a need for an organizational structure that would meet the comprehensive needs of complex problems, projects, and programs, especially when the resources were limited.. “Designing Matrix Organizations That Actually Work” Jay R. Galbraith says “Organization structures do not fail, but management fails at implementing them successfully.” He argues that strategy, structure, processes, rewards and people all need to be aligned in a successful matrix implementation. If the control is balanced between the project manager/expeditor and the functional manager, the organization is … … While a project manager is assigned to each undertaking, he or she acts solely as a … Structure of matrix organization. In a weak matrix, the authority is with a functional manager, just like in a functional organization. A weak matrix structure is typically found in a function-based organization. Therefore the functional managers have authority on … The project manager works like an expediter or a coordinator. And a balanced matrix, the authority over. Functional Organizations vs Projectized Organizations - PMP Exam. If the project manager/expeditor has more control over the project than the functional manager, the organization is strong matrix. READ MORE on 4squareviews.com. The traditional infrastructure was unable to meet the rising demands of large organizations that were under a conventional management system. This structure is usually referred to as functional organization or weak matrix structure. Key components of a … In this kind of structure, any initiative that crosses the boundaries of functional silos has … 5. Silos are directed by functional or line managers. A weak matrix retains the management of the project in the hands of the functional managers instead of the project team, like this: On the other side, a strong matrix is still a functional organizational structure, but has a completely separate project management arm. Weak Matrix. 4. 6. The matrix organizational structure originally arose out of the aerospace industry in the 1960s when firms who wanted to contract with U.S. government employees needed to create specific charts to show the structure of the project management team. This way of working is the norm in complex organizations. Getting matrix management right is linked inextricably to an organization’s culture - the only sustainable competitive advantage. Matrix organizations can be classified as weak, balanced or strong based on the relative authority of the Functional Manager and Project Manager; If the “Project Manager” is given a role of more like “Project Co-ordinator” or “Project Expediter”, then the organization is considered “Weak Matrix” If the “Project Manager” is given much more authority on resources and budget … Weak Matrix In a weak matrix structure, a project manager works like a project coordinator or project expeditor.